On 30/03/13 7:18, Joakim Ziegler wrote: > On 29/03/13 10:38, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 03/29/2013 01:23 AM, Joakim Ziegler wrote: >>> Immediately after getting dropped to rdshell, I looked around in /dev, >>> which brought me a few surprises... >>> /dev/mapper contains only "control", that is, "vg_resolve02-lv_root" is >>> missing. >> Did you get to look at or for /dev/vg_resolve02 as well? >>> /dev/root is a symlink to /dev/dm-0 >> Does /dev/dm-0 exist? >> Does the system boot if you just "exit" from the rdshell? What about if >> you "vgchange -a y" without changing the symlink? > I checked this a bit more thoroughly. The status is as follows: > When I boot up and get dropped to rdshell, neither /dev/root nor > /dev/vg_resolve02, nor /dev/dm-0 exist. Just exiting at this point drops > me back into rdshell. Waiting a few minutes makes no difference. > Doing lvm vgscan finds the volume group, but creates no device nodes. > Just exiting at this point drops me back into rdshell as well. > When I do lvm vgchange -ay, /dev/dm-0 is created, /dev/root is created > as a symlink to it, as well as /dev/vg_resolve02/ with lv_root inside > it, and /dev/mapper/vg_resolve02-lv_root. I don't need to change the > symlink or do anything else, if I exit after doing lvm vgchange -ay, > everything is ok. >>> That means /dev/root already is correct, so the only thing I'm actually >>> changing to make the system boot is to scan for volume groups and >>> activate them. >>> The big question then becomes: Why do I have to do this manually? How do >>> I make Dracut (I assume this is Dracut's job) make this automatically? >> udev should be doing this. And... I was just looking at this again, >> because the last time I came up with nothing useful. Look at >> /usr/share/dracut/modules.d/90lvm/64-lvm.rules. If I'm reading this >> correctly, udev will look for dm-0 in /sys and will not run lvm_scan if >> it's found. I wonder if it's possible that the /sys nodes are getting >> set up, but device-mapper isn't setting up the nodes in /dev? > It turns out I was wrong about dm-0 already existing, it's created on > vgchange -ay. I'm looking at the file you mention, but I'm afraid I > don't know LVM well enough to make that much sense of it. From what I > can tell, it calls lvm_scan for each device, and there's an lvm_scan.sh > in there that looks like it should be doing lvchange -ay, but if dm-0 > doesn't already exist, I don't think this will do anything, am I wrong? >> I'm really at a loss... it seems like a much simpler explanation is >> simply that the devices take so long to detect that init gives up. When >> you run vgchange, they've had the time they need. That idea is >> inconsistent with the fact that your dmesg output shows what I assume is >> the correct devices and partition tables. > >> You could try adding "rdinitdebug rdudevdebug" to your kernel command >> line, but you're going to see a LOT of output, and it's only really >> going to be meaningful if you've read the /init script that Dracut >> creates, and understand more or less what it's doing, particularly in >> the "main_loop" section. > I can try this, but it might be a bit beyond my area of expertise, I'm > afraid. > If I were to just try a brute force approach, what RPM packages should I > reinstall/update to get all this stuff reinstalled as it was the first > time I installed the system? Just bumping this up, any ideas about this? It's a little annoying not having this box boot by itself... -- Joakim Ziegler - Supervisor de postproducción - Terminal joakim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx - 044 55 2971 8514 - 5264 0864 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos