Regards, YB Tan Sri Dato' Sri Adli a.k.a Dell my.linkedin.com/pub/yb-tan-sri-dato-sri-adli-a-k-a-dell/44/64b/464/ H/p number: (017) 362 3661 ________________________________ From: SilverTip257 <silvertip257@xxxxxxxxx> To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:28 AM Subject: Re: 2nd NIC troubles On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:34 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 4/16/2013 11:05 AM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote: > > I do have another gateway at 10.0.254.1, it is a Linksys router that all > > the provate stuff plugs into, and that Linksys plugs directly into our > > modem. > > multiple gateways is problematic. there should be only one default > route to 0.0.0.0/0 Seconded -- multiple default gateways are definitely problematic. You could set a metric on the second interface (eth1) prior to upping it so that the primary has priority. This doesn't completely remedy problematic situations though. Example: if eth0 is downed at the switch, but not downed on the host ... so the host will continue to try and use eth0. A situation in which serial remote management or physical vga/ip kvm access is helpful. ;) Add "METRIC=30" to your ifcfg-eth1 file. > > > > so you have a pfSense firewall AND a linksys soho router both connected > to the internet? sounds messy. > > > > -- > john r pierce 37N 122W > somewhere on the middle of the left coast > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos