Re: RAID 6 - opinions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 2013-04-11, David C. Miller <millerdc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Just for reference, I have a 24 x 2TB SATAIII using CentOS 6.4 Linux MD RAID6 with two of those 24 disks as hotspares. The drives are in a Supermicro external SAS/SATA box connected to another Supermicro 1U computer with an i3-2125 CPU @ 3.30GHz and 16GB ram. The connection is via a 6Gbit mini SAS cable to an LSI 9200 HBA. Before I deployed it into production I tested how long it would take to rebuild the raid from one of the hot spares and it took a little over 9 hours.

I did a similar test on a 3ware controller.  Apparently those cards have
a feature that allows the controller to remember which sectors on the
disks it has written, so that on a rebuild it only reexamines those
sectors.  This greatly reduces rebuild time on a mostly empty array, but
it means that a good test would almost fill the array, then attempt a
rebuild.  I definitely saw a difference in rebuild times as I filled the
array.  (In 3ware/LSI world this is sometimes called "rapid RAID
recovery".)

In checking my archives, it looks like a rebuild on an almost full 50TB
array (24 disks) took about 16 hours.  That's still pretty respectable.
I didn't repeat the experiment, unfortunately.

I don't know if your LSI controller has a similar feature, but it's
worth investigating.

--keith


-- 
kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux