On Friday, October 26, 2012 10:41:19 AM Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But, having said all of that, it must be said that the SL update > > 'nondisruptive index' is not 100%; it is really close to 100%, but there > > have been a few niggles over the years. > > How many things have you had break from a Centos update? While there haven't been many, I haven't counted, and those things would have broken with upstream EL as well. The worst one was back in EL4 days when a kernel update in the PCI enumeration order caused eth0 and eth1 to swap ports on some Dell servers I had. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos