On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > But, having said all of that, it must be said that the SL update > 'nondisruptive index' is not 100%; it is really close to 100%, but there have > been a few niggles over the years. How many things have you had break from a Centos update? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos