On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 14:09 -0500, Josh Kelley wrote: > On 11/9/05, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > because this got asked offlist, right away..... SnapShots on Lvm2 are > > still kinda broken - the results you achieve are never predicatable. > > How broken? Any details? I found a few comments online that multiple > snapshots may not work or that snapshotting can be memory intensive; > will LVM2 snapshots work at all, or am I better off just avoiding them > for now? > I would not use snapshots at all on LVM2 right now (at least not for anything important, or on a machine that is important. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051109/3dcc70fc/attachment.bin