Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> Leonard Isham <leonard.isham@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Anyone considered or used OpenFiler? It's based on CentOS.
>>http://www.openfiler.com/
>
>
> Damn that looks sweet! I didn't even know about it!
> CentOS 3-based.
>
> I'm sure they haven't addressed failover and many other
> concerns, and it's not an "all-in-one" like old SME Server
> (fka E-Smith), but it's definitely a nice, entry-level
> "Filer".
>
> Screenshots to note ...
>
> Network/host definitions and access control:
> http://www.openfiler.com/screenshots/shots/general_local_networks_1.png
> http://www.openfiler.com/screenshots/shots/shares_edit_share_3.png
>
> Select directory service(s):
> http://www.openfiler.com/screenshots/shots/accounts_authentication_2.png
>
> Group and host access control:
> http://www.openfiler.com/screenshots/shots/shares_edit_share_5.png
>
> Quotas:
> http://www.openfiler.com/screenshots/shots/quota_group_quota_2.png
>
> I saw snapshots mentioned as well, which work quite well
> under kernel 2.4 and LVM (i.e., CentOS 3).
>
> All screen shots:
> http://www.openfiler.com/screenshots/
>
> FAQs -- General and Administration:
> http://www.openfiler.com/docs/faq/openfiler-general-faq.html
>
> http://www.openfiler.com/docs/faq/openfiler-administration-faq.html
>
OpenFiler2 based on CentOS4/lvm2 is due out before the end of this month.
We are going to still support the CentOS3/Openfiler 1 series for a
while, SnapShots being an important factor.
- K
PS: OpenFiler is my day job
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq
