On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > We've had a number of servers fail, and it *seems* to be related to the > motherboard. I too have had bad experiences with SuperMicro motherboards; never had one last more than three years. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- From: Steve Thompson <smt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:03:23 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <f4e62c3631c11178984d2b00df6c6f9c.squirrel@mail.5-cent.us>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- From: Luke S. Crawford
- Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- From: KevinO
- Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- From: m . roth
- Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- References:
- Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- From: Rafał Radecki
- Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- From: m . roth
- Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- From: m . roth
- Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- Prev by Date: abrtd problems
- Next by Date: Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- Previous by thread: Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- Next by thread: Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- Index(es):
 |