On 06/26/12 7:37 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Are you looking for full servers, or to build from parts? Someone just > recommended Supermicro; I'm not a big fan of them just now - we have a > good number of servers from Penguin Computing that use that, and the 64 > core systems seem to have a lot of problems. Their 48 core servers seem > fine. The SuperMicro Intel stuff seems just fine. I'd be more leary of AMD. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:30:17 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <52ff0779e46cda5c1e7be01503cf82b6.squirrel@mail.5-cent.us>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- From: m . roth
- Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- References:
- Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- From: Rafał Radecki
- Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- From: m . roth
- Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- Prev by Date: Re: CentOS 6 bridging problem.
- Next by Date: Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- Previous by thread: Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- Next by thread: Re: Universal server hardware platform - which to choose?
- Index(es):
 |