Re: partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 24/6/2012 7:47 μμ, Keith Roberts wrote:

> And what happens then in that situation - do you loose any
> more data than you would loose with 'standard' primary and
> extended logical partitions, or does using LVM help in
> recovering more data from a bad disk?

Read: http://serverfault.com/questions/279571/lvm-dangers-and-caveats

In a few words, if your hardware is high-quality, i.e. reliable enough 
so you don't expect problems, LVM adds important functionality and 
flexibility on servers.

In any case, the need for good backups should not be overlooked. For 
example, mondorescue allows both full and incremental backups, using LVM 
or not.

Nick
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux