Re: transition to ip6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Peter Eckel <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Routing tables won't do much for you when you have several different IP addresses (stateless autocnfigured, privacy extension and static) within the same network on the same physical interface - they'll all use the same route. The longest match algorithm would more or less lead to a random choice of source addresses.
>
> If you want a specific source address to be used, you have to specify it ... no big deal, though. bind() hasn't changed that much.

So what does that mean for a client application (http/ftp,etc.) where
you might have local firewalls permitting things for internal-subnet
source ranges but you also have external targets that only accept
pre-configured static sources?  With NAT you'd use the public side of
the NAT for the remote configuration.   What's the equivalent when the
application has to do it itself?

-- 
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux