Re: transition to ip6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 16:38 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Peter Eckel <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 1. Each interface on an IPv6 enabled machine has several addresses.
> > 2. Except for the Privacy Extension address(es), auto-configured a
> How do applications choose the correct outbound address in that
> scenario?  That has always been a problem when using multiple ipv4
> addresses on the same interface in combination with firewalling, etc.
> where the source address matters.

Typically the routing table does a lot of work.   Much like 127.0.0.0/8
the mask of a link-local will make it unprefered by 'public' traffic.
There is also a syntax for specifying the outbound interface for
traffic.

See <http://wmmi.net/documents/BasicIPv6.pdf> slide 24 - 26.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux