-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Adam, > Or you assign the rule to the interface, rather than the address. > Nothing new, that is how firewalls work on DHCP clients today. that will be pretty difficult on the perimeter router ... Best regards, Peter. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAk95eW0ACgkQ+8TW1Xhd1gcSXACg0Sculr5FUZ1yQxIHp581r0Gi musAnRUVVMVav2HBKmQuK6IDmVY98jrt =Fazc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: transition to ip6
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: transition to ip6
- From: Peter Eckel <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:03:19 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1333359667.2816.0.camel@workstation.wmmi.net>
- References:
- transition to ip6
- From: Bob Hoffman
- Re: transition to ip6
- From: Adam Tauno Williams
- Re: transition to ip6
- From: Peter Eckel
- Re: transition to ip6
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: transition to ip6
- From: Tilman Schmidt
- Re: transition to ip6
- From: Adam Tauno Williams
- transition to ip6
- Prev by Date: Re: transition to ip6
- Next by Date: Re: transition to ip6
- Previous by thread: Re: transition to ip6
- Next by thread: Re: transition to ip6
- Index(es):
 |