On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Ross Walker <rswwalker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> But you'd be wrong on all counts. I'd argue the opposite - that you >> should only be allowed to use languages that work across CPU types and >> OS's so as to never be locked into a monopolistic single vendor. > > You mean like Oracle? No, I meant like Intel or an OS that only runs on one or a few CPU types, or a language that only runs on one OS. Aside from the constraints/control the associated vendor might impose you lock yourself out of an easy move to any new alternatives that might come along or consolidation of apps on the platform of your choice. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos