On Jan 10, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But you'd be wrong on all counts. I'd argue the opposite - that you > should only be allowed to use languages that work across CPU types and > OS's so as to never be locked into a monopolistic single vendor. You mean like Oracle? -Ross _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- From: Ross Walker <rswwalker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:42:25 -0500
- Cc: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAOAgVpxoHUUFL9uVW9wfa9SLZmqcWWD5-Mts-UM39mgd1BzLkA@mail.gmail.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: SELinux and access across 'similar types'
- Next by Date: Re: Is Amanda "vaulting" what I need for archiving data?
- Previous by thread: Re: bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Next by thread: Re: bug submission justified for distribution of obsolete java software?
- Index(es):
 |