On 11/28/2011 7:37 PM, david wrote:
> At 04:32 PM 11/28/2011, you wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 04:07:27PM -0800, david wrote:
>>
>> Please do not top-post to the centos mailing lists - thank you.
>>
>>> Is priority=1 more important than priority=2? If so, then I already have
>> Yes. "highest" priority is 0; "lowest" priority is 99.
>>
>>> at priority 1:
>>> base, centosplus, updates, extras
>>> at priority 3
>>> cr
>> cr will never be permitted to update base/centosplus/updates/extras
>> currently.
>>
>> I must apologize for my original response; wording was quite confusing,
>> if not outright wrong.
>>
>> It should have read:
>>
>> "Priority must be the same or higher than base/updates; lower numeric values
>> are rated at a higher priority."
> OK. (bottom posting) ... so the priorities are set correctly, yet CR
> doesn't show up in the YUM repo listing. HELP?
No, your priorities are *not* set correctly. CR must be at the same or
lower-numbered priority than the base and updates repos. If base is at
priority 1, then CR should also be at priority 1.
I think the confusion comes in because a lower number means a higher
priority. In order for the CR repo to update the base packages, it must
have the same or a higher priority (meaning the same or a lower number).
--
Bowie
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
