not using LVM for Linux VM guests?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I came across an old post comment yesterday (from http://echenh.blogspot.com/2010/04/how-to-extend-lvm-on-vmware-guest-os.html ) discussing the "hack" of LVM on Linux VM guests and whether it's better not to use it to simplify disk management.
I've re-posted the comment below, does it sound reasonable? Is it better to not use LVM on Linux VM guests?

--Russell


-----------------------------------------------------------
At my job, after doing the same kind of procedure graph, we began to ask ourselves, why are using a LVM on a Linux VM guests?

Since we're no longer living in the physical OS world, we didn't need to use the OS hacks(LVM) to overcome physical disk limitations anymore.
We decided to Just let the hypervisor and virtual storage do that work for us.

For example, in our production setup (3 tier commerce with VMs for database , webserver, and appserver), we're see a great improvement in managability and performance (>10%) by just dropping LVM, and most partitions.

In your example, the resize process is 7 functional steps:
1. Increase size of VMDK
2. In VM OS, Create Partition (??)
3. REBOOT (!!)
4. PVCreate
5. VGExtend
6. LVExtend
7. Resize2fs

Going to a LVM/partition-less setup reduces expansion to 3 steps and we don't need to take the VM OS offline!
1. Increase size of VMDK
2- Inside the VM, OS, rescan the scsi drive with:'echo 1 >/sys/class/scsi_device//rescan; dmesg' (dmesg will check that you drive isize has grown)
3- Resize2fs.

Our current disk arrangement has 3 VM HD devices
0 - small device (100M) with a single BOOT partition
1 - entire device is /
2 - entire device is SWAP

Doing this has simplified resizing so much, I now let the junior admins and my manager expand drive space as needed.

It's also let's us really be spartan on space since expansion is so quick. Instead of increasing systems in 30-50GB chunks, we can do 10-15GB and let our rmonitoring system warn us when space gets tight.
-------------------------------------------------------------

=======================================================================
Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments
from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch
Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately.
=======================================================================
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux