Re: redhat vs centos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:47 AM, fred smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:30:57AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 12:47 AM, David Hrbáč wrote:
>>> Dne 1.11.2011 17:27, Akemi Yagi napsal(a):
>>>> Real "problem" with recent release troubles with CentOS is that some
>>>> (or many?) are migrating to Ubuntu/Debian rather than to other RHEL
>>>> clones, which might eventually hurt the entire Red Hat community.
>>>
>>> Well, there are no other RHEL clones except SL/Centos. We have quite
>>> large infrastructure and we want it homogeneous as possible. Because we
>>> run a few boxes with IBM, Ora stuff we need "certified" OSes, certified
>>> is only RHEL or SuSE. So we are using RHEL and Centos. We have been
>>> running happily and smoothly for a few years with this concept. Because
>>> of the lastest issues with CentOS we are really considering moving back
>>> to Debian.
>>
>> Ever heard of WBL? :-D
>
> White Box Linux?
>
> Isn't it dead?
>

Same thought I had when I saw someone on irc say he is using WBL...
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux