Re: redhat vs centos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:30:57AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 12:47 AM, David Hrbáč wrote:
> > Dne 1.11.2011 17:27, Akemi Yagi napsal(a):
> >> Real "problem" with recent release troubles with CentOS is that some
> >> (or many?) are migrating to Ubuntu/Debian rather than to other RHEL
> >> clones, which might eventually hurt the entire Red Hat community.
> >
> > Well, there are no other RHEL clones except SL/Centos. We have quite
> > large infrastructure and we want it homogeneous as possible. Because we
> > run a few boxes with IBM, Ora stuff we need "certified" OSes, certified
> > is only RHEL or SuSE. So we are using RHEL and Centos. We have been
> > running happily and smoothly for a few years with this concept. Because
> > of the lastest issues with CentOS we are really considering moving back
> > to Debian.
> 
> Ever heard of WBL? :-D

White Box Linux?

Isn't it dead?

-- 
---- Fred Smith -- fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----------------------------
                        The Lord is like a strong tower. 
             Those who do what is right can run to him for safety.
--------------------------- Proverbs 18:10 (niv) -----------------------------
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux