On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 05:16 -0700, Craig White wrote: > > >> Gmagic/Imagick are somewhat incapable of doing graphing at all. > > Have you ever really looked ? What about GmagickDraw::point and similar > items ? I think the risk of the KISS approach is that you tend to reimplement everything, because everything everyone else has done is overcomplicated. It's not that you *can't* do all this yourself, but that you're possibly dealing with life at a layer or two lower than you might. Simply by using an existing library (say jpgraph, but it's chosen at random) you get a load of functionality (that gets improved over time) without having to implement any of it yourself. You're not simply producing a graph, you're producing code that draws a graph and then drawing a graph. Why write the code? I much prefer other people's bugs to my own, as there's a chance they'll fix it, or failing that, I can fix their bug and the world's a better place. jh _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos