On Jul 14, 2011, at 8:02 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/14/11 7:39 AM, przemolicc@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> What is the reason to avoid ZFS ? IMHO for such systems ZFS is the best. > > Oracle, mostly. How about Nexenta then? Their product is solid, their prices reasonable and I think their in good financial health. -Ross _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: really large file systems with centos
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: really large file systems with centos
- From: Ross Walker <rswwalker@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:50:00 -0400
- Cc: "centos@xxxxxxxxxx" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4E1F83A7.1030100@hogranch.com>
- References:
- really large file systems with centos
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: really large file systems with centos
- From: Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: really large file systems with centos
- From: przemolicc
- Re: really large file systems with centos
- From: John R Pierce
- really large file systems with centos
- Prev by Date: Re: autofs problem on CentOS6
- Next by Date: Re: amd64_edac: probe of 0000:00:18.2 failed with error -22
- Previous by thread: Re: really large file systems with centos
- Next by thread: Re: really large file systems with centos
- Index(es):
 |