On 07/14/11 7:39 AM, przemolicc@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > What is the reason to avoid ZFS ? IMHO for such systems ZFS is the best. Oracle, mostly. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: really large file systems with centos
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: really large file systems with centos
- From: John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:02:47 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20110714143900.GA10749@host.pgf.com.pl>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: really large file systems with centos
- From: Ross Walker
- Re: really large file systems with centos
- References:
- really large file systems with centos
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: really large file systems with centos
- From: Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: really large file systems with centos
- From: przemolicc
- really large file systems with centos
- Prev by Date: Re: really large file systems with centos
- Next by Date: Re: CentOS 6 x86_64 DVD doesn't boot
- Previous by thread: Re: really large file systems with centos
- Next by thread: Re: really large file systems with centos
- Index(es):
 |