centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 7/8/11, Mark Bradbury <mark.bradbury@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Bollocks. this IS the only place to post to, as information is >> sorely lacking. >> >> Really this whole release cycle has been a complete balls up. >> >> For goodness sake I hope that the next release will be more >> transparent and professional. It really does not look good for >> CentOS and open source in general. > > The fact the devs did do something about the complaints, > Much better than the total blackout from before. Something is better than nothing, for sufficiently large values of something. Insert spiffy .sig here: Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary parts. Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away. //me ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated** _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos