Re: CentOS-6 Status updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
From: Gordon Messmer <yinyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:52:09 -0700
Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5c08ec61590d48f9d5d72aa4be15bb36.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10

On 06/16/2011 06:15 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 2 isn't much used, except as a set of steps

I think you're referring to Solaris' init.  I'm not aware of any Linux 
init systems that start up by stepping through runlevels.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

References:
- Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
  - From: Les Mikesell
- Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
  - From: Ron Blizzard
- Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
  - From: Les Mikesell
- Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
  - From: Ron Blizzard
- Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
  - From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic
- Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
  - From: Ron Blizzard
- Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
  - From: Tom H
- Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
  - From: Ron Blizzard
- Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
  - From: m . roth
- Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
  - From: Tom H
- Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
  - From: Scott Robbins
- Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
  - From: m . roth

Prev by Date: Re: Slightly OT: First Time KVM and LVM on Centos
Next by Date: Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
Previous by thread: Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
Next by thread: Re: CentOS-6 Status updates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [CentOS] [CentOS Announce] [CentOS Development] [CentOS ARM Devel] [CentOS Docs] [CentOS Virtualization] [Carrier Grade Linux] [Linux Media] [Asterisk] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Xorg] [Linux USB]