Re: OT: RHEL 6.1 is out

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



R P Herrold wrote:

> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
> 
>> Community effort or not, it did once seem like you had goals
>> for timeliness as well.  Are you happy with the current
>> situation?  If more community participation is off the
>> table, what else could help?

> Tell you what, Les -- YOU build what you want, optionally
> gathering a 'community', and document what YOU want, and tell
> us the URL.  We'll all be richer for it.  I'll be happy to see
> more than talk from you.  But then I expect to hear ...
> crickets

This seems to me to be an unnecessarily agressive response
to what appeared to me a rational question from Les Mikesell.

Why not just say, "Sorry, Les, there's nothing you can do to help",
if that is in fact the situation.

Personally, I don't mind when CentOS-6 (or 6.1) comes out,
as I am perfectly happy with (and grateful for) CentOS-5.6,
and haven't seen anything in RHEL 6.0 that would help
my rather simple needs in running a small home server.

But I don't think the fact that a service is free
entitles its proponents to be rude to those using it.
 







-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux