On 05/12/2011 10:09 AM, Craig White wrote: > > On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury <mark.bradbury@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less >>>>> complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ? >>>>> >>>>> And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would >>>>> take no more than 1 month ? >>>> >>>> Get over yourself Dag ... for goodness sake. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Why? seems like a valid point to me. >> >> But at that time there should only be one point release on the table, >> instead of two point releases and one major release. Is everyone >> forgetting that 4.9, 5.6 and 6.0 were all out at the same time? > ---- > I think you are confusing overlap with simultaneous. > > • 2011-02-16: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.9 > • 2011-01-13: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.6 > • 2010-11-10: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 > > 2 months elapsed from release of 6.0 before 5.6 and more than another month before 4.9 > > Hardly qualifies at the same time unless you consider 3 months to be essentially the same time. > OH, and most people take off Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year's day vacations, so the release of 5.6 and 6.0 are very close when you take into account that usually most people take off 2-4 weeks of the time between Mid November and the first week in January.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
