Re: EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

[Craig White <craig.white@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On May 12, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:

> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Mark Bradbury <mark.bradbury@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Do you expect the C6.0 -> C6.1 differences to be more complex, or less
>>>> complex than the C5.5 -> C5.6 differences ?
>>>> 
>>>> And given that C5.6 took 3 months, are there any reasons why C6.1 would
>>>> take no more than 1 month ?
>>> 
>>> Get over yourself Dag ... for goodness sake.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Why? seems like a valid point to me.
> 
> But at that time there should only be one point release on the table,
> instead of two point releases and one major release. Is everyone
> forgetting that 4.9, 5.6 and 6.0 were all out at the same time?
----
I think you are confusing overlap with simultaneous.

 • 2011-02-16: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.9
 • 2011-01-13: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.6
 • 2010-11-10: Distribution Release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

2 months elapsed from release of 6.0 before 5.6 and more than another month before 4.9

Hardly qualifies at the same time unless you consider 3 months to be essentially the same time.

-- 
Craig White ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  craig.white@xxxxxxxxxx
1.800.869.6908 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ www.ttiassessments.com 

Need help communicating between generations at work to achieve your desired success? Let us help!

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos