Re: rpm libuser-devel is not signed

[m.roth@xxxxxxxxx]

Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 08:34 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>>> Not updating is entirely sensible and sounds like the best default
>>> position.
>>> Installing a package you'd expect to be signed when it isn't signed
>>> should ring alarm bells.
>>
>> I agree that my first answer was probably wrong, even with all
>> disclaimers and warnings.
<snip>
> Maybe this would work out:
>
> yum --nogpgcheck update libuser-devel
>
> then you can update everything else later with gpg on.
>
I *like* that answer. And command line only, so the next time you go to
yum update, it'll get the fixed package.

> Although, like I said, this particular issue has now been corrected.

And *very* quickly.

          mark

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos