Re: rpm libuser-devel is not signed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 04/21/2011 08:34 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>> Not updating is entirely sensible and sounds like the best default position.
>> Installing a package you'd expect to be signed when it isn't signed should
>> ring alarm bells.
> 
> I agree that my first answer was probably wrong, even with all
> disclaimers and warnings.
> 
> I thought of a technical way (--nogpgcheck) to solve the issue,
> whereas the right answer was definitely procedural (as you point out,
> not updating, what I would have done on my own systems).
> 
> I apologize, but I did my best...
> 
>> Freedom includes being free to make poor decisions.
> 
> I fully agree with you.

Maybe this would work out:

yum --nogpgcheck update libuser-devel

then you can update everything else later with gpg on.

Although, like I said, this particular issue has now been corrected.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux