On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 17:41 -0800, Francois Caen wrote: > On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 06:34:24 -0700, Craig White <craigwhite@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You could just paste these lines into a terminal > > Worked great. > > I was surprised that yum wanted to update 30 packages afterwards, > since my RHEL box was up 2 date. Looks like the centos package numbers > make yum belive they're newer (even though they aren't). Take a look and see if those are *.centos* packages. There are several packages which have some changes from the RHEL packages. These changes are usually trademark issues, pictures/logos, web links, etc. There are several .centos RPMS (65 {out of 1156} RPMS in CentOS-3.4 ... 40 RPMS {out of 1404} in CentOS-4) ... those numbers are for i386 for each version. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.caosity.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050328/3c98b4e8/attachment.bin