Re: how is "binary compatibility" determined?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 14:47 -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Dvorkin, Asya <dvorkias@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks Keith, good question, that should have been on my list of
> >>> "Questions to ask about CentOS building process", and thanks to Akemi
> >>> for a quick answer :)
> >>
> >> Given that its answered in a FAQ one could argue that it was not a good
> >> question.
> >
> > You know, there is a famous saying.. "If you have nothing nice to say, don't say anything at all".
> >
> 
> 
> Yes, and not to mention the giant warning on the top of that page:
>     Comment from Karanbir Singh:
>     "Just want to point out that CentOS does not use anything from that page
>     - and details / scripts on that page have nothing to do with the CentOS
>     process."
> 
> 
> // Brian Mathis


Okay, I'm getting a touch confused here. Are you saying that this page
is a red herring?? Because if it is irrelevant, then does anyone have an
issue if that page gets nuked? What's the point if it's not helpful?

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux