On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 08:58 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Keith Keller
> <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > We've seen quite a few references on the list to "100% binary
> > compatibility with upstream". What I am curious about is, how precisely
> > is this determined? All the ways I can think of for comparing how two
> > systems might work seem flawed in some way (e.g., using some sort of
> > checksum; unit testing; verifying build parameters). I did some
> > searches both at centos.org and google, but couldn't find anything
> > specific about the test(s) used to determine compatibility.
>
> In this FAQ:
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General/RebuildReleaseProcess
>
> "Once built ... we use the tmverifyrpms against it from here:
>
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos-4/4/build/distro/ "
>
> Akemi
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanks Keith, good question, that should have been on my list of
"Questions to ask about CentOS building process", and thanks to Akemi
for a quick answer :)
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
