Re: The delays on CentOS 5.6 are causing EPEL incompatibilities

[Dag Wieers <dag@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, John R. Dennison wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:22:36AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>
>> CentOS 4.8 (95 days late) and CentOS 5.3 (69 days late) have been the worst
>> delays. But now CentOS 5.6 is already at 69 days and CentOS 6.0 is past
>> 133 days delay, an all time record (not counting CentOS 2 :-)).
>
>        You keep tossing out "late".  "late" implies a published deadline
>        and I've yet to see one.  I see "best effort" and "will try"
>        comments in many places, but never a published deadline.  So,
>        why the focus on "late"?

John,

The definition of "late" according to many dictionaries:

     after the expected or usual time

Let me ask you the same question, why the focus on "late" ?

Kind regards,
-- 
-- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, info@xxxxxxxxx, http://dagit.net/

[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos