On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:22:36AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote: > > CentOS 4.8 (95 days late) and CentOS 5.3 (69 days late) have been the worst > delays. But now CentOS 5.6 is already at 69 days and CentOS 6.0 is past > 133 days delay, an all time record (not counting CentOS 2 :-)). You keep tossing out "late". "late" implies a published deadline and I've yet to see one. I see "best effort" and "will try" comments in many places, but never a published deadline. So, why the focus on "late"? John -- Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Albert Einstein
Attachment:
pgpkOjsSueEka.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
