On 03/04/2011 08:42 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> robert mena wrote:
>> Well, I am just telling that since there is no actual schedule, no plans
>> to change the way things are handled (lack of communication, treat this as
>> personal project etc) the best way to simply forget about it.
>>
>> The solution is good now and will be good whenever it appears. So there
> <snip>
> Actually, it strikes me that I *do* have a question: what are the main
> problems in the build/release? Has RH deliberately obscured some part(s)
> of its build process, or made prerequisites utterly dependent upon
> specific versions of libraries - that is, more than y'all have had to deal
> with before?
>
> Note that this is a question about the problemss, *not* about how y'all
> are going about it, nor whining that I Want It Yesterday!!! As someone who
> spent a lot of years as a developer (and let's not talk about the death
> march at a former Baby Bell), I like to know the kinds of problems that
> are ongoing, so I can get some feel for what's going on.
>
> mark "sorry, no time to do some of the real work, RL is overwhelming
> at the moment"
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I saw this posted yesterday on h-online.com.
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Controversy-surrounds-Red-Hat-s-obfuscated-source-code-release-1200554.html
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
