On 03/02/2011 04:45 PM, David HrbÃÄ wrote: > Dne 2.3.2011 01:14, Dag Wieers napsal(a): >> >From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS >> RHEL4: 2005-02-14 >> CentOS-4: 2005-03-09 23 days >> >> RHEL5: 2007-03-14 >> CentOS-5: 2007-04-12 29 days >> >> RHEL6: 2010-11-10 >> CentOS-6: TBD 112+ days >> >> Priority is CentOS 5.6, which is what people are actually using. It is >> very likely a RHEL 6.1 Beta is out before CentOS-6.0. Early RHEL 6.1 Beta >> access has been offered by Red Hat to RHCE's already. >> > > RHEL5.6: 2011-01-12 > Centos-5.6: TBD 50+ days > AND? Do you think we can't count? Do you think we are not trying or damnedest to get it done as fast as we possibly can? What, exactly, is the problem here? You have my permission to use something else. Does that help?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
