On Mar 2, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 04:45 PM, David HrbÃÄ wrote:
>> Dne 2.3.2011 01:14, Dag Wieers napsal(a):
>>>> From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS
>>> RHEL4: 2005-02-14
>>> CentOS-4: 2005-03-09 23 days
>>>
>>> RHEL5: 2007-03-14
>>> CentOS-5: 2007-04-12 29 days
>>>
>>> RHEL6: 2010-11-10
>>> CentOS-6: TBD 112+ days
>>>
>>> Priority is CentOS 5.6, which is what people are actually using.
>>> It is
>>> very likely a RHEL 6.1 Beta is out before CentOS-6.0. Early RHEL
>>> 6.1 Beta
>>> access has been offered by Red Hat to RHCE's already.
>>>
>>
>> RHEL5.6: 2011-01-12
>> Centos-5.6: TBD 50+ days
>>
>
> AND?
>
> Do you think we can't count?
>
> Do you think we are not trying or damnedest to get it done as fast
> as we
> possibly can?
>
> What, exactly, is the problem here?
>
> You have my permission to use something else. Does that help?
Dave,
Wow you actually got a dev to waste time in responding to your post.
I'd say your a pie hole, the brown eyed suzie kind. Go buy RHEL for a
few hundies then.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
