On 2/21/2011 12:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/21/2011 11:08 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 2/21/11 10:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people
to release faster ? This is something that has to be done by Karanbir only ?
Dag,
The packages have to be built in a specific order, preferably the order
that they are originally produced in, so that they can be linked
properly. Package A builds, then Package B, then Package C. If package
B is broken, it needs to be fixed, then Package C needs to be built, etc.
This is not something that can be done by several people at the same
time in parallel, no. Not and be done correctly.
Couldn't the process be wrapped into a matrix build in Hudson (or now Jenkins)
across a large farm of build slaves with a list of successful builds falling out
at the end? For at least the set of things that succeed in one of the common
environments...
Seeing as how we are currently dealing with 2 trees in the QA directory
for testing right now (4.9 and 5.6) ... 6.0 will be waiting until we get
those out of QA.
So you are constrained by workspace? Or number of people involved? And you
don't see that as a problem that could be corrected?
SHUT UP
if you do not like CentOS ... use something else
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
step away johnny. These type of responses only further the
highminded reputation Centos core is developing. Just ignore
it..continue your great work on Centos in general..:)
|
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
