On 02/21/2011 11:08 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 2/21/11 10:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people >>> to release faster ? This is something that has to be done by Karanbir only ? >>> >> Dag, >> >> The packages have to be built in a specific order, preferably the order >> that they are originally produced in, so that they can be linked >> properly. Package A builds, then Package B, then Package C. If package >> B is broken, it needs to be fixed, then Package C needs to be built, etc. >> >> This is not something that can be done by several people at the same >> time in parallel, no. Not and be done correctly. > > Couldn't the process be wrapped into a matrix build in Hudson (or now Jenkins) > across a large farm of build slaves with a list of successful builds falling out > at the end? For at least the set of things that succeed in one of the common > environments... > >> Seeing as how we are currently dealing with 2 trees in the QA directory >> for testing right now (4.9 and 5.6) ... 6.0 will be waiting until we get >> those out of QA. > > So you are constrained by workspace? Or number of people involved? And you > don't see that as a problem that could be corrected? > SHUT UP if you do not like CentOS ... use something else
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
