On 17 February 2011 16:06, Larry Vaden <vaden@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > List infraction per <http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16>. This was amusing to start with, but now it's irritating. Please stop. Ben _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- From: Benjamin Donnachie <benjamin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:09:57 +0000
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=3ZBgkfw881O46NgJYU7zBQ-qvvWejai2awoVe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- From: Scot P. Floess
- Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- References:
- some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- From: Larry Vaden
- Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- From: Larry Vaden
- Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- From: Scot P. Floess
- Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- From: Larry Vaden
- Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- From: Scot P. Floess
- Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- From: Larry Vaden
- some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- Prev by Date: Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- Next by Date: Re: vanilla kernel configuration :: xconfig --> qt errors
- Previous by thread: Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- Next by thread: Re: some think there are no unemployed OSS folks
- Index(es):
 |