On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Scot P. Floess <sfloess@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Sure - I get it... ÂBut any prolonged debate - just address those
> concerns/issues with that person...
>
> I hate to say it, but I suspect either nobody cares or just doesn't want to
> hear it...
>
> Remember, I responded to you directly about an earlier post as I didn't feel
> it added any value to this mailing list. ÂThis is exactly what I meant and
> why...
>
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, Larry Vaden wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Scot P. Floess <sfloess@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we all just get along? ÂI love reading this list and posting my own
>>> questions as well... ÂBut really - is this helping anyone?
>>
>> We were taught by our Rhodes scholar debate mentor to refute untruths
>> and that is what I did.
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> --
> Scot P. Floess
>
>
> RHCT Â(Certificate Number 605010084735240)
>
> Chief Architect FlossWare Âhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â http://flossware.sourceforge.net
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare
>
> Chief Architect JPlate   http://sourceforge.net/projects/jplate
> Chief Architect JavaPIM Â Âhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/javapim
> Chief Architect Keros   Âhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/keros
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
List infraction per <http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16>.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
