> probably due to the fact that centos 5.6 hasn't been released yet, any > packages released by RH in 5.6 and afterwards aren't in centos yet. Looks like you are correct -- I didn't realize RH5.6 had been released. Thanks for that. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- From: James Chase <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:02:27 -0500
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4D595CCA.2020107@xxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4
- References:
- Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- From: James Chase
- Re: Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- From: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
- Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- Next by Date: rescheduling sector linux raid ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- Next by thread: rescheduling sector linux raid ?
- Index(es):
 |