James Chase wrote: > According to the RH5 Errata, the most recent package for > scsi-target-utils is scsi-target-utils-1.0.8-0.el5.x86_64.rpm > > However the latest update via yum on CentOS is labeled > scsi-target-utils-0.0-6.20091205snap.el5_5.3 probably due to the fact that centos 5.6 hasn't been released yet, any packages released by RH in 5.6 and afterwards aren't in centos yet. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- From: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:48:10 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4D595814.10403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailscanner-null-check: 1298306890.43703@77u15XvDjzhMMxeffPaluw
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110115 SeaMonkey/2.0.11
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- From: James Chase
- Re: Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- References:
- Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- From: James Chase
- Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- Prev by Date: Re: server specifications
- Next by Date: Re: Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- Previous by thread: Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- Next by thread: Re: Are some CentOS package out of date compared to RH?
- Index(es):
 |