On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There are any number of 3rd party repos that maintain many newer > packages, so getting things into CentOSPlus is not the only option. I would very much appreciate your referral to a repo that has a current BIND. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Larry Vaden <vaden@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:59:48 -0600
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4D544540.2080506@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Ray Van Dolson
- Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- References:
- how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Larry Vaden
- Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Ned Slider
- Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Johnny Hughes
- Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Keith Keller
- Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- From: Johnny Hughes
- how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- Prev by Date: Re: dhcp fail over
- Next by Date: Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- Previous by thread: Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- Next by thread: Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?
- Index(es):
 |