Re: how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:53:09AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> 
> This is correct, CentOS would add an updated package somewhere (our
> people.centos.org site or the centos-testing repository would be the
> likely places).
> 
> We want our release to be the same source code where ever possible ...
> only changing things as required to meet trademark restrictions.

In general, is there a process for deciding whether a package is
qualified for inclusion in the centosplus repo?  I imagine it's
something along the lines of "this package had better be well-built and
important enough to break 100% binary compatibility", but I can't
find anything specific in the docs.  (I personally only use the
XFS-related packages out of centosplus, but I can imagine wanting
to watch it if other packages appear there that might be useful
or interesting.)

--keith


-- 
kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgplDegUl2Buu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux