On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:53:52AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is*
> >> in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL
> >
> > Then it's on-topic on the EPEL list, not here. e.g. ask there for an
> > updated version of the package.
> >
> > This wasn't the first instance. This guy has recently started a habit of
> > copying mails (that are not his own it seems) that trip him off right to
> > this list. That is bad practice. I do not want to get more of this.
>
> My effort was to understand the conditions under which CentOS and/or
> SL would ever go to current edition for a particular component (e.g,
> BIND) and I think I understand now and can resign from the list with
> all due apologies to list members.
>
> kind regards/ldv
Kai's opinions are not shared by many of us. You're welcome back any
time.
Thanks,
Ray
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
