Re: kernel update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:42:38PM -0500, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:03:34PM -0500, JohnS wrote:
> > 
> > > Upgrading the kernel *can* work, but defeats the purpose of running an 
> > > enterprise OS.
> > 
> > I find your statement to not be true at all.
> > 
> > Upstream offers two (2) different Enterprise Level kernels to pick,
> > choose and play with.  CentOS only ships one of them.
> 
> Oracle does, I know.  Does RH?

I see you answered in a later post.  Oracle offers their unbreakable
kernel or something similar, for their 5.x release.   That's a 2.6.32
kernel, which is what I thought you meant. 

Thanks for your later clarification.

-- 
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

Buffy: So. You saw their faces, but you can't describe
them.
Spike: Well, they were human. Two eyes each, kind of in the middle.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux