Re: kernel update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 06:03:34PM -0500, JohnS wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 17:33 -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> 
> > Upgrading the kernel *can* work, but defeats the purpose of running an 
> > enterprise OS.
> 
> I find your statement to not be true at all.
> 
> Upstream offers two (2) different Enterprise Level kernels to pick,
> choose and play with.  CentOS only ships one of them.

Oracle does, I know.  Does RH?


-- 
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

Willow: Oz is a werewolf. 
Buffy: It's a long story. 
Oz: Got bit. 
Buffy: But obviously not that long. 

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux