On 1/19/2011 1:51 PM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> That's not the point. You've had years to learn how to make a computer
>> work like a slightly smarter typewriter, and for a long time that was
>> about all they could do and everyone was happy with it. But that's not
>> what someone starting today should expect.
>
> How much more do you do with it? I've pasted pictures and spreadsheets
> into it; what else do you do? Certainly, bulleting isn't as bulletproof as
> it was in my (legal) copy of WordPerfect 6.0.c for DOS, that I keep
> thinking of running under wine.
At work, more and more I am building reports with the Pentaho report
writer to be viewed through their web service (which can generate html,
pdf, xls, etc.) or auto-emailed. I'm not particularly fond of it, but
it does what they call pixel-perfect layouts and at least as of the last
(3.7) release, has a wizard that does most of the grunge work of the
sizing and positioning of elements.
At home, the Mac automatically downloads podcasts which automatically
update an ipod when I plug it in to recharge - and I listen to them in
the car during my commute. I can also rip dvds there, and can play
these, or music, or view photos over the network on tv's in other rooms
through the media player in a blu-ray player and the kid's PS3.
>> OK, now it's my turn to misinterpret your position: you are saying that
>> all of the work that the upstream developers are doing has no value and
>> the field of computer science was complete when CentOS 5 was released
>> (or was it awk...). And I disagree.
>
> That's absurd. What I'm saying is that much of what's added is nothing
> more than eye candy, and features that almost no one actually uses. And
> just *what* do you have against awk?!<g> (says the guy who learned it and
> wrote 100-200 line scripts, lo, these many years ago).
The point is that better things have come along that don't have the same
restrictions (and for the same price). It's one thing to keep using
something that works yourself, but something else to recommend that
someone else start out with the less capable version.
> I also think that to some extent, CS has gotten onto a wrong tack (and my
> article on the failure of OO in general, and java in particular, will be
> written as soon as my life in the RW slows down some).
Ummm, I don't claim to be a java programmer, but more and more of the
things I use all the time are written in java: OpenNMS, Hudson, the
Pentaho tools, the web servers I support, and it's pretty hard to find
fault with them, especially in a very cross-platform environment. And
google's Dalek variation for android seems to be taking over the world.
>> My company is fairly distributed and lives on conference calls - and I
>> absolutely need the calendar integration/reminders to track the
>> scheduling. As far as the email component goes, I usually have a
>> thunderbird imap view of the same messages - and have used evolution
>> without any real difference in capabilities except in what happens when
>> I open (e.g) a visio file on a non-windows platform. I can't think of
>> anything you'd want a mailer to do that would be 'hard' in any of those
>> environments.
>
> Setting up encryption, certificates, digital sigs, how my email is
> displayed....
I haven't set up a certificate but I thought it was a fill-in-the form
sort of setup. And you can change the display arrangement.
>>> Huh? I have no problem with streaming media, or playing pretty much any
>>> media that I care to. What media is difficult to serve?
>>
>> What apps are you using for (say) podcast subscription management,
>
> Don't do podcasts.
I recommend it if there is ever an occasion where you'd listen to talk
radio but can't match the scheduling. There are some for every
interest, updated regularly, and software that will grab the new items
in subscribed feeds.
>> playing audio/video files, or serving them to upnp/DLNA devices? If you
>
> Playing them? Realplayer or mplayer, mostly. Ubuntu wants to use some
> media player, and I haven't gotten around to doing a ps to find out what
> it is. Haven't been asked to serve video/audio.
>
>> are using 3rd party sources you are making my point about CentOS not
>> making a great desktop, and if you enable more than one 3rd party yum
>> repository you are setting the system up for future conflicts.
>
> What 3rd party software? So far, everything's in the distro.
Last time I tried, mp3 support wasn't even there. You must have added
3rd party repositories which are not at all coordinated for RHEL/Centos
additions. Ubuntu seems much better about keeping the state of the
extra repositories in sync with each other and including the repository
info in the distribution even for the ones that are disabled by default.
>> That good software is still being developed and updates are
>> worthwhile??? Yes, I believe that.
>
> Yes, I agree that some updates are worthwhile, and good software is still
> being developed - don't try to suggest I was saying *nothing* new is good;
> all I was saying is that the majority of New! Features! aren't worth it.
And I'm saying that someone who hadn't already learned to live with the
old limitations is very likely to have a different opinion about the
value of new vs. old features.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
