On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Digimer <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The kernel is, if I recall correctly, 2.6.18 that has only been patched
to fix bugs and security features. The modern kernel is 2.6.37, and a
*lot* of hardware has come along in the years in between. For example,
it's unlikely that things like bluetooth, most wireless interfaces,
modern video cards, etc, will work.
Another option, if you are concerned about the short life cycle of
Fedora, would be to look at Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. The 'LTS' means "Long Term
Support" and will be supported for a fairly long time. 10.04 was
released last April, so it will be quite up to date.
Okay, as seem Ubuntu is supposed to have a longer life.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Cameron Kerr <cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Okay, but my meaning to say was that it has an end of life every six months.
Yes, and one main difference could be that Cent OS might serve purpose better for servers.Doesn't have stability!? News to me (at least for Ubuntu). Seriously though, you would probably find that a Fedora or Ubuntu would support your desktop hardware (particularly things like Wireless and Graphics card) much better than a distribution aimed at servers. It's also a lot more newbie friendly.
Okay, but my meaning to say was that it has an end of life every six months.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Note that ubuntu has an 'LTS" (long term support) version that splits the
difference between the really fast moving releases and ones that go unchanged
for a decade. I was pleasantly surprised a short time ago when I fired up my
dual-boot laptop into an old install of ubuntu 8.04LTS and it asked if I wanted
to upgrade to the newer 10.4LTS release, then proceeded to do it, automatically
and successfully.
There are, however, big differences in administration commands between Ubuntu
and Centos - but if you are just starting out that probably doesn't matter.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Robert Heller <heller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
RedHat does back port drivers, at least 'essential' ones. But yes, much
'bleeding edge' hardware might not be supported.
My PC is for home purpose only and I have only a small hardward - just speakers, a printer (Samsung printer), one net connection, one flatron screen with an assemble CPU having Inter Core 2 duo processor, 2 GB ram and 250 GB hard-disk. Speakers are frequently used and nothing else. In this scenario, I hope that all the drivers red hat might be supporting as it is the minimal of a computer sys., now in this bleeding edge technology era!
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Robert Heller <heller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In theory yes. The thing is the 'minimal install' would be very
minimal indeed. Probably no GUI or any of the other 'goodies' you
might expect to have. This would be fine for a fairly experienced IT
person, but might be somewhat 'hard' for a novice user.
If can only manage to download *one* *CD* (either can't deal with a DVD
or don't want to download 7 CDs), then you should download the
netinstall CD. This is actually a very *small* iso image. Assuming you
have a decent Internet connection, the netinstall CD can install
packages directly from the Internet.
Ok I try one way.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Robert Heller <heller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is good for:
1) Taking a 'test drive' to see if linux is something you want to
pursue. Or to demostrate Linux to people who might not have seen or
used Linux -- it is easier to lug a CD than a whole computer.
2) To use as a multifunction rescue system.
3) To use Linux on a machine that Linux cannot be installed on (eg not
your machine).
4) To see if Linux will work on the machine in question before
committing to installing on it. Can be used to test Linux compatibity
with store display models, for example.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Michael Klinosky <mpk2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's meant to be used to test if the distro likes your system, or test
if you like the distro.
Do you know what a 'Live CD' is? Boot your computer from it; it'll run
the OS - but only in RAM or from the CD. It won't change anything on
your hard drive.
Oh I see, this is really good option Linux has provided!
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
CentOS will work for desktop use but it is not ideal, especially as it gets
older. With only a few exceptions, the support updates have only bug and
security fixes to the package versions shipped in the original release of the
major distribution version number without adding new features. This is a good
thing if you run servers with a lot of your own programming that depends on the
exact behavior of the libraries from that version, but it is a lot less
important for an individual user that wants the newest features from all of the
available packages.
If you still want CentOS and aren't in a big hurry, you might wait for the
CentOS6 release which should be coming soon. CentOS 5.x has packages from
around the Fedora 6 era. CentOS 6 should jump that up to be similar to Fedora 14.
Nice, Cent OS 6 would be releasing by the Jan end or Feb, I think....? Another important thing I have is that like you are suggesting for Fedora or Ubuntu but that the newest cutting edge technology could be installed in the older hardware assuming that the hardware has minimal composition, like, only 2 gb ram, hard disk and speaker, with keyboard and a non-usb mouse. In this hardware too we can install any cutting edge OS like fedora or it really depends on the hardware that if it would accept a particular distro or not!
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
